Benq RL2755 vs Samsung S27E510C

(123)
(1)
Benq RL2755
Samsung S27E510C

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overstock
eBay
Amazon US
Out of stock
elite-market
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S27E510C (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Three times faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a response time of 1msms, however the Samsung S27E510C is a 4msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S27E510C only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by $83
The Benq RL2755 is $82.96 cheaper than the Samsung S27E510C.
7 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
5 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, whereas the Benq RL2755 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S27E510C is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (178°°).
0.6g lighter Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has a weight of 4.9kgg, whereas the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g heavier).
Shorter Edit
Samsung S27E510C is 365.7mmmm tall. That's 112.3mm shorter than the Benq RL2755 (365.7mmmm).
3% narrower Edit
Samsung S27E510C is 623.2mmmm wide. That's 15.8mm narrower than the Benq RL2755 (623.2mmmm).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, whereas the Samsung S27E510C is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Samsung S27E510C (178°°).
0.6g heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kgg, whereas the Samsung S27E510C is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g lighter).
Taller Edit
Benq RL2755 is 478mmmm tall. That's 112.3mm taller than the Samsung S27E510C (365.7mmmm).
Wider Edit
Benq RL2755 is 639mmmm wide. That's 15.8mm wider than the Samsung S27E510C (623.2mmmm).
Older by over one year
The Benq RL2755 is 14 months older than the Samsung S27E510C.
6 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27E510C is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Benq RL2755 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
3ms slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has a response time of 4msms, however the Benq RL2755 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27E510C is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
One less DVI port Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has DVI ports, however the Benq RL2755 only has one DVI port.
More expensive by $83
The Samsung S27E510C is $82.96 more expensive than the Benq RL2755.
Fewer sellers
The Samsung S27E510C is only stocked by 4 retailers, but the Benq RL2755 is stocked by 11 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Awards

2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

24 months Ago 9 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.15mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 68cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3114
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -2 - 20
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
24.21W
BEST
28W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 54kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 35W
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
BEST
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.2kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 435mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 135mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 695mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.5kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 463mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 181.6mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 623.2mm
Weight
5.5kg 4.9kg
BEST
Height
478mm 365.7mm
BEST
Depth
213mm
BEST
59.9mm
Width
639mm 623.2mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA
Feedback