LG 27MP67 vs Samsung S27E510C

(5)
(1)
LG 27MP67
Samsung S27E510C

Top Prices

No prices found
eBay
Amazon US
Out of stock
elite-market
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
A little bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 27MP67 has a display diagonal of 69cmcm, whereas the Samsung S27E510C is only a 68cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (1cm smaller).
0.6g lighter Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.6g lighter than the Samsung S27E510C (4.9kgg).
7.9mm shallower Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 52mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 7.9mm shallower than the Samsung S27E510C (59.9mmmm).
A bit narrower Edit
LG 27MP67 is 614mmmm wide, but the Samsung S27E510C is a 623.2mmmm wide PC monitor (9.2mm wider).
3 Reasons For
1ms faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E510C is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the LG 27MP67 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

40kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has an annual energy consumption of 54kWhkWh, whereas the LG 27MP67 is a 94kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (40kWh higher).
A bit shorter Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has a height of 365.7mmmm, however the LG 27MP67 is a 369mmmm tall PC monitor (3.3mm taller).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
20% slower response time Edit
The LG 27MP67 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E510C (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 27MP67 has an annual energy consumption of 94kWhkWh, however the Samsung S27E510C is a 54kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (40kWh lower).
3.3mm taller Edit
LG 27MP67 is 369mmmm tall, but the Samsung S27E510C is a 365.7mmmm tall PC monitor (3.3mm shorter).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over one year older
The LG 27MP67 is older than the Samsung S27E510C by 14 months.
5 Reasons Against
1cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has a display diagonal of 68cmcm, but the LG 27MP67 is a 69cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (1cm bigger).
Only DVI ports Edit
The Samsung S27E510C is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 27MP67 only has one DVI port.
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E510C is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.6g heavier than the LG 27MP67 (4.9kgg).
Deeper Edit
Samsung S27E510C is 59.9mmmm deep. That's 7.9mm deeper than the LG 27MP67 (59.9mmmm).
9.2mm wider Edit
The Samsung S27E510C has a width of 623.2mmmm, however the LG 27MP67 is a 614mmmm wide PC monitor (9.2mm narrower).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

24 months Ago 9 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
69cm
BEST
68cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3114
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-3 - 20 -2 - 20
Automatic Shut Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.3W 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
26W
BEST
28W
Standby Power Consumption
0.29W
BEST
0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
94kWh 54kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 35W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
10 - 35 10 - 40

Certificates

EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.3kg
BEST
7.2kg
Packaging Height
442mm 435mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
154mm 135mm
BEST
Packaging Width
689mm
BEST
695mm
Weight With Stand
4.6kg
BEST
5.5kg
Height With Stand
470mm 463mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
205mm 181.6mm
BEST
Width With Stand
614mm
BEST
623.2mm
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height
369mm 365.7mm
BEST
Depth
52mm
BEST
59.9mm
Width
614mm
BEST
623.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC

Technical Details

Auto Power Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback