Benq BL2711 vs DELL P2715Q

(11)
(119)
Benq BL2711

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
5ms faster response time Edit
The Benq BL2711 has a response time of 4msms, but the DELL P2715Q is a 9msms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

1% narrower Edit
The Benq BL2711 is a 639mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 1.74mm narrower than the DELL P2715Q (640.74mmmm).
3 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
11 Reasons For
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the Benq BL2711 is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
One more DisplayPort Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Benq BL2711 only has one DisplayPort.
Four USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL P2715Q is four, but the Benq BL2711 only has two USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Two more USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port PC monitor, whereas the Benq BL2711 only has two USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
Four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL P2715Q is four, but the Benq BL2711 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.
Lighter Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 3g lighter than the Benq BL2711 (5kgg).
Marginally shorter Edit
DELL P2715Q is 379.66mmmm tall, but the Benq BL2711 is a 384.95mmmm tall PC monitor (5.29mm taller).
Shallower Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 18.25mm shallower than the Benq BL2711 (51.5mmmm).
$23 cheaper
The DELL P2715Q is $23 cheaper than the Benq BL2711.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 2 expert reviews, the DELL P2715Q has an average review score of 85%, whereas the Benq BL2711 has an average rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews).
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 117 user reviews, the DELL P2715Q has an average review score of 88%, whereas the Benq BL2711 has an average rating of 73% (based on 9 reviews).

Reasons Against

11 Reasons Against
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq BL2711 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL P2715Q (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Benq BL2711 has one DisplayPort, however the DELL P2715Q only has two DisplayPorts.
Two less USB 3.0 ports Edit
The Benq BL2711 is a two USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2715Q only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Only two USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The Benq BL2711 has two USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports, however the DELL P2715Q only has four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
Two less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Benq BL2711 is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2715Q only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
3g heavier Edit
The Benq BL2711 has a weight of 8kgg, however the DELL P2715Q is a 5kgg weight PC monitor (3g lighter).
Taller Edit
The Benq BL2711 is a 384.95mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 5.29mm taller than the DELL P2715Q (379.66mmmm).
18.25mm deeper Edit
The Benq BL2711 has a depth of 69.75mmmm, however the DELL P2715Q is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor (18.25mm shallower).
More expensive by $23
The Benq BL2711 is $23 more expensive than the DELL P2715Q.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The Benq BL2711's average expert score is 80%, however the DELL P2715Q's is 85% (based on 2 reviews).
User review Rating is much Worse
The Benq BL2711's average user score is only 73%, however the DELL P2715Q's is 88% (based on 117 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 9msms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms slower than the Benq BL2711 (9msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only DVI ports Edit
The DELL P2715Q has DVI ports, however the Benq BL2711 only has one DVI port.
1.74mm wider Edit
DELL P2715Q is 640.74mmmm wide, but the Benq BL2711 is a 639mmmm wide PC monitor (1.74mm narrower).
Fewer sellers
Only 15 stores sells the DELL P2715Q, but 18 shops sell the Benq BL2711. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Three months older
The DELL P2715Q is older than the Benq BL2711 by three months.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
Digitaltrends.com: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

22 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 51.49
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 51.49
Purchase price $ 432.99
Total cost of ownership $ 484.48
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.155 x 0.155 0.1554 x 0.1554
Display Colour Count
1,070M 1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.47cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms
BEST
9ms
Color Gamut
100% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 2.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
2 4
BEST
HDMI Port
1 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
2 4
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 4
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
6W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
140mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
-45 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.8A
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
42W
BEST
50W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 95W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
11kg 10.7kg
BEST
Height With Stand
550.62mm 423.86mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
239.65mm 203.86mm
BEST
Width With Stand
639mm
BEST
640.74mm
Weight
8kg 5kg
BEST
Height
384.95mm 379.66mm
BEST
Depth
69.75mm 51.5mm
BEST
Width
639mm
BEST
640.74mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
Feedback