Samsung S27D390 vs Samsung S27E390H

(75)
(105)
Samsung S27D390
Samsung S27E390H

Top Prices

PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Marginally bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm, but the Samsung S27E390H is only a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm smaller).
59x lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 0.3WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 17.5W lower than the Samsung S27E390H (17.8WW).
7% lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g lighter than the Samsung S27E390H (4.6kgg).
0.89999999999998mm shorter Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a height of 376.3mmmm, however the Samsung S27E390H is a 377.2mmmm tall PC monitor (0.89999999999998mm taller).
Slightly narrower Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a width of 625.2mmmm, however the Samsung S27E390H is a 626mmmm wide PC monitor (0.79999999999995mm wider).
4 Reasons For
25% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Samsung S27D390 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

14% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has an annual energy consumption of 37kWhkWh, however the Samsung S27D390 is a 42kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh higher).
8.8mm shallower Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 70.8mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 8.8mm shallower than the Samsung S27D390 (70.8mmmm).
User reviews are a little better
Based on 104 user reviews, the Samsung S27E390H has an average review score of 86%, whereas the Samsung S27D390 has an average rating of 84% (based on 69 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

5kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has an annual energy consumption of 42kWhkWh, whereas the Samsung S27E390H is a 37kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh lower).
Deeper Edit
Samsung S27D390 is 79.6mmmm deep. That's 8.8mm deeper than the Samsung S27E390H (70.8mmmm).
Eleven months older
The Samsung S27D390 is older than the Samsung S27E390H by eleven months.
Moderately Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27D390 has an average user rating of 84%, but the Samsung S27E390H has an average user rating of 86% (based on 104 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
0.099999999999994cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a display diagonal of 68.5cmcm, whereas the Samsung S27D390 is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm bigger).
Only DVI ports Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has DVI ports, however the Samsung S27D390 only has one DVI port.
Higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 17.8WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 17.5W higher than the Samsung S27D390 (17.8WW).
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g heavier than the Samsung S27D390 (4.6kgg).
Slightly taller Edit
Samsung S27E390H is 377.2mmmm tall, but the Samsung S27D390 is a 376.3mmmm tall PC monitor (0.89999999999998mm shorter).
0.79999999999995mm wider Edit
Samsung S27E390H is 626mmmm wide, but the Samsung S27D390 is a 625.2mmmm wide PC monitor (0.79999999999995mm narrower).

Awards

2 Awards
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
ua.gecid.com: Original Design
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

34 months Ago 22 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 81 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.3mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 240

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-1 - 20 -2 - 15
Automatic Shut Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.3W
BEST
17.8W
Typical Power Consumption
22W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
42kWh 37kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
29W 29W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
10 - 40 10 - 40

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6kg 6.6kg
BEST
Packaging Height
437mm 140mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
132mm
BEST
442mm
Packaging Width
694mm
BEST
703mm
Weight With Stand
4.7kg
BEST
5.1kg
Height With Stand
453mm 452.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
209.8mm 181.9mm
BEST
Width With Stand
625.2mm
BEST
626mm
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
4.6kg
Height
376.3mm
BEST
377.2mm
Depth
79.6mm 70.8mm
BEST
Width
625.2mm
BEST
626mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Auto Power Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9 x 336.3
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback