DELL U2715H vs HP Z2

(138)
(4)
DELL U2715H
HP Z2

Top Prices

Amazon US
Out of stock
Adorama
Out of stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock (89 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.11cm bigger than the HP Z2 (68.47cmcm).
Two more USB 3.0 ports Edit
The DELL U2715H is a six USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the HP Z2 only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One more HDMI port Edit
The DELL U2715H has two HDMI ports, however the HP Z2 only has one HDMI port.
Two more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2715H is a six USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the HP Z2 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
2.8g lighter Edit
The DELL U2715H has a weight of 4.9kgg, however the HP Z2 is a 7.7kgg weight PC monitor (2.8g heavier).
Better expert reviews
Based on 4 expert reviews, the average review score of the DELL U2715H is 80%, however the average rating of the HP Z2 is 73% (based on 4 reviews).
4 Reasons For
A lot bigger viewable height Edit
The HP Z2 has a viewable height of 596.74mmmm, whereas the DELL U2715H is only a 335.66mmmm viewable height PC monitor (261.08mm smaller).
7% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP Z2 is an 83WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 5W lower than the DELL U2715H (83WW).
Cheaper by $236
The HP Z2 is $236.19 cheaper than the DELL U2715H.
1 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Vastly smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL U2715H has a viewable height of 335.66mmmm, however the HP Z2 is a 596.74mmmm viewable height PC monitor (261.08mm bigger).
One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the DELL U2715H is , but the HP Z2 only has one DVI port.
6% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2715H is an 88WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 5W higher than the HP Z2 (83WW).
More expensive by $236
The DELL U2715H is $236.19 more expensive than the HP Z2.
Less retailers
The DELL U2715H is only stocked by 4 retailers, whereas the HP Z2 is stocked by 5 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by six months
The DELL U2715H is six months older than the HP Z2.
6 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Z2 is a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.11cm smaller than the DELL U2715H (68.47cmcm).
Two less USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the HP Z2 is four, but the DELL U2715H only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One less HDMI port Edit
The HP Z2 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2715H only has two HDMI ports.
Two less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP Z2 is four, but the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports.
2.8g heavier Edit
The HP Z2 has a weight of 7.7kgg, whereas the DELL U2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (2.8g lighter).
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the HP Z2 is only 73%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2715H is 80% (based on 4 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

26 months Ago 20 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1440p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Height
335.66mm 596.74mm
BEST
Viewable Width
596.74mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Pixel Pitch
0.2331 x 0.2331 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.58cm
BEST
68.47cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 14ms
BEST
Color Gamut
99% 99%
SmartResponse
6ms Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
2 2
USB 3.0 Port
6
BEST
4
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPort
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
6 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
6
BEST
4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
90 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
5 - 21 -5 - 22
Swivel Angle Range
45 - 45 -45 - 45

Power

Current Rating
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
36W
BEST
37W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 55kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
88W 83W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 10 - 80
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.7kg
Height With Stand
524.9mm
BEST
533.7mm
Depth With Stand
205mm 18.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
612.7mm
BEST
614.3mm
Weight
4.9kg
BEST
7.7kg
Height
363.4mm 364.1mm
Depth
46.4mm 53.9mm
Width
612.7mm 614.3mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
Feedback