Asus VX248 vs Samsung S23C200

(214)
(8)
Asus VX248
Samsung S23C200

Top Prices

No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Marginally bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VX248 has a screen size of 24"", however the Samsung S23C200 is only a 23"" PC monitor (1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2.58cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus VX248 has a display diagonal of 61cmcm, however the Samsung S23C200 is only a 58.42cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (2.58cm smaller).
Four times faster response time Edit
The Asus VX248 is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms faster than the Samsung S23C200 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Fourty-three times lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Asus VX248 is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 21.5W lower than the Samsung S23C200 (22WW).
User reviews are marginally better
Based on 214 reviews, the Asus VX248 has an average user review score of 93%, however the Samsung S23C200 has an average rating of 90% (based on 8 reviews).
1 Reason For
Lighter Edit
The Samsung S23C200 is a 2.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g lighter than the Asus VX248 (2.9kgg).

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
Only DVI ports Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Asus VX248 is , but the Samsung S23C200 only has one DVI port.
Heavier Edit
The Asus VX248 is a 3.2kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g heavier than the Samsung S23C200 (2.9kgg).
7 Reasons Against
1" smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S23C200 has a screen size of 23"", but the Asus VX248 is a 24"" PC monitor (1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S23C200 has a display diagonal of 58.42cmcm, but the Asus VX248 is a 61cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (2.58cm bigger).
80% slower response time Edit
The Samsung S23C200 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Asus VX248 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

98% higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Samsung S23C200 is a 22WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 21.5W higher than the Asus VX248 (22WW).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over one year older
The Samsung S23C200 is older than the Asus VX248 by 18 months.
A little Lower user review Score
The Samsung S23C200 has an average user rating of 90%, but the Asus VX248 has an average user rating of 93% (based on 214 reviews).

Average User Rating

Date Released

30 months Ago 49 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
24"
BEST
23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 286.74mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 509.76mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.277 x 0.277 0.2655 x 0.2655
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
61cm
BEST
58.42cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -1 - 20

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W
BEST
22W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
23.2W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.1W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.1kg 4.6kg
BEST
Packaging Height
510mm 140mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
141mm
BEST
412mm
Packaging Width
636mm 620mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
3.2kg
BEST
3.3kg
Height With Stand
338mm
BEST
404.65mm
Depth With Stand
210.1mm 185mm
BEST
Width With Stand
535.4mm
BEST
542.9mm
Weight
3.2kg 2.9kg
BEST
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 321.4mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 76.3mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 542.9mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 VGA
 AC

Other Features

Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s)
Placement
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 620 x 412 x 140
Dimensions With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 542.9 x 185 x 404.65
Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 542.9 x 76.3 x 321.4
Feedback