HP Z Display Z34 vs Samsung S34E790C

(71)
HP Z Display Z34
Samsung S34E790C

Top Prices

No prices found
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Overstock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The HP Z Display Z34 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S34E790C (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
3% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP Z Display Z34 is a 91kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh lower than the Samsung S34E790C (93kWhkWh).
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The HP Z Display Z34 has an energy efficiency rating of "C", whereas the Samsung S34E790C has a rating of "C".
6 Reasons For
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has a response time of 4msms, however the HP Z Display Z34 is an 8ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8kg lighter Edit
The Samsung S34E790C has a weight of 7.4kgg, whereas the HP Z Display Z34 is an 8kg weight PC monitor (8kg heavier).
3% shorter Edit
Samsung S34E790C is 364mmmm tall. That's 10.1mm shorter than the HP Z Display Z34 (364mmmm).
Significantly shallower Edit
The Samsung S34E790C is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the HP Z Display Z34 is a 93.9mm deep PC monitor (42.4mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
Samsung S34E790C is 821.5mmmm wide. That's 129.3mm narrower than the HP Z Display Z34 (821.5mmmm).
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Samsung S34E790C has an energy efficiency rating of "C", whereas the HP Z Display Z34 has a rating of "C".

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
4ms slower response time Edit
The HP Z Display Z34 has a response time of 8ms, however the Samsung S34E790C is a 4msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8kg heavier Edit
The HP Z Display Z34 has a weight of 8kg, whereas the Samsung S34E790C is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor (8kg lighter).
Taller Edit
HP Z Display Z34 is 374.1mm tall. That's 10.1mm taller than the Samsung S34E790C (364mmmm).
42.4mm deeper Edit
The HP Z Display Z34 is a 93.9mm deep PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S34E790C is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor (42.4mm shallower).
Wider Edit
HP Z Display Z34 is 950.8mm wide. That's 129.3mm wider than the Samsung S34E790C (821.5mmmm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
3 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S34E790C is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP Z Display Z34 (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S34E790C is a 93kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh higher than the HP Z Display Z34 (93kWhkWh).
Older by four months
The Samsung S34E790C is four months older than the HP Z Display Z34.

Awards

No awards found 4 Awards
avforums.com: Recommended
benchmark.pl: Good Product
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

22 months Ago 26 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 113.81
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 116.14
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.75T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.75 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
19
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
34"
BEST
34"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 3440 x 1440
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
Viewable Height
333.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
749.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.232 x 0.232 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
86.36cm 86cm
BEST
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 4ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
2 2
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
6W
BEST
14W
Loudspeaker
2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 100mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -2 - 20
Swivel Angle Range
-180 - 180 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
Power Consumption When Off
0.48W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
93W 64W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
91kWh
BEST
93kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
150W
BEST
77W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 14.4kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 531mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 339mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 899mm
Weight With Stand
9.8kg 9.9kg
BEST
Height With Stand
477.1mm 452mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
197.2mm
BEST
275.5mm
Width With Stand
950.8mm 821.5mm
BEST
Weight
8kg 7.4kg
BEST
Height
374.1mm 364mm
BEST
Depth
93.9mm 51.5mm
BEST
Width
950.8mm 821.5mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
BEST

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback