Eizo FlexScan EV3237 vs Samsung U32D970Q

(19)
(32)
Eizo FlexScan EV3237
Samsung U32D970Q

Top Prices

Overstock
eBay
In stock (19 available)
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Vastly more display colour count Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a display colour count of 16.77MM, however the Samsung U32D970Q is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
Significantly faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a response time of 5msms, whereas the Samsung U32D970Q is an 8msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 105WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 35W lower than the Samsung U32D970Q (140WW).
Slightly shallower Edit
Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is 59.5mmmm deep, but the Samsung U32D970Q is a 62.1mmmm deep PC monitor (2.6mm deeper).
One more awards
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has 6 awards from expert review sites, however the Samsung U32D970Q has 5 awards.
5 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
1% shorter Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q has a height of 427.3mmmm. That's 0.69999999999999mm shorter than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (427.3mmmm).
Narrower Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q has a width of 727.8mmmm. That's 3.2mm narrower than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (727.8mmmm).
Marginally better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Samsung U32D970Q is 86% based on 27 reviews, but the average rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is 84% (based on 17 reviews).
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the Samsung U32D970Q is 88% based on 5 reviews, but the average rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is 70% (based on 2 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Samsung U32D970Q (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
1% taller Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a height of 428mmmm. That's 0.69999999999999mm taller than the Samsung U32D970Q (427.3mmmm).
Wider Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a width of 731mmmm. That's 3.2mm wider than the Samsung U32D970Q (727.8mmmm).
Older by one month
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is one month older than the Samsung U32D970Q.
Expert review Rating is marginally Worse
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has an average expert score of 84%, but the Samsung U32D970Q has an average expert rating of 86% (based on 27 reviews).
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 only has an average user score of 70%, but the Samsung U32D970Q has an average user rating of 88% (based on 5 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Vastly less display colour count Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q has a display colour count of 1,070MM, however the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M more).
A lot slower response time Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q has a response time of 8msms, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 only has one DVI port.
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung U32D970Q is a 140WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 35W higher than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (140WW).
Slightly deeper Edit
Samsung U32D970Q is 62.1mmmm deep, but the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 59.5mmmm deep PC monitor (2.6mm shallower).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
One less award
The Samsung U32D970Q has only received 5 awards, however the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has received 6 awards.

Awards

6 Awards
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
itwriter.ru: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
Lydogbilde.no: Best in Test 5 Star
megaobzor.com/: Recommended
5 Awards
altomdata.dk: Test Winner
chinese.vr-zone.com: Editor's Choice
Digitaltrends.com: Editor's Choice
ixbt.com: Excellent Package
Trusted Reviews: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

29 months Ago 29 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
31.5" 31.5"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
Viewable Height
392mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
696.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.1815 x 0.1815 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
80cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
8ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 280

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
2 2
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
139mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
5 - 35 -5 - 20
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 344 -30 - 30
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 D
 D
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
30W 130W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 131kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
105W
BEST
140W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 18.4kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 556mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 347mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 795mm
Weight With Stand
10.6kg
BEST
13.7kg
Height With Stand
578mm 490.6mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
245mm
BEST
280mm
Width With Stand
731mm 727.8mm
BEST
Weight
7.8kg 10.3kg
BEST
Height
428mm 427.3mm
BEST
Depth
59.5mm
BEST
62.1mm
Width
731mm 727.8mm
BEST
Feedback