DELL P2415Q vs DELL U2715H

(49)
(138)
DELL P2415Q
DELL U2715H

Top Prices

eBay
Overstock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Adorama
Out of stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
A lot lighter Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a weight of 3.3kgg, whereas the DELL U2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (1.6g heavier).
9% shorter Edit
DELL P2415Q is 336.06mmmm tall. That's 27.34mm shorter than the DELL U2715H (363.4mmmm).
Narrower Edit
DELL P2415Q is 566.64mmmm wide. That's 46.06mm narrower than the DELL U2715H (612.7mmmm).
Cheaper by $226
The DELL P2415Q is $225.74 cheaper than the DELL U2715H.
19 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
A little better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL P2415Q is 84%, whereas the average rating of the DELL U2715H is 80% (based on 4 reviews).
14 Reasons For
3.2" bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2715H has a screen size of 27"", whereas the DELL P2415Q is only a 23.8"" PC monitor (3.2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

39.2mm bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 335.66mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 39.2mm bigger than the DELL P2415Q (335.66mmmm).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL U2715H has a viewable width of 596.74mmmm, but the DELL P2415Q is only a 527.04mmmm viewable width PC monitor (69.7mm smaller).
More display colour count Edit
DELL U2715H is 16.77MM display colours. That's 15.77M more than the DELL P2415Q (16.77MM).
8.11cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2715H has a display diagonal of 68.58cmcm, whereas the DELL P2415Q is only a 60.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (8.11cm smaller).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2715H has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the DELL P2415Q is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the DELL P2415Q (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Six USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL U2715H is six, but the DELL P2415Q only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The DELL U2715H is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2415Q only has one HDMI port.
Two more USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The DELL U2715H is a six USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2415Q only has four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
Six USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL U2715H is six, but the DELL P2415Q only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
2W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2715H has a maximum power consumption of 88WW, whereas the DELL P2415Q is a 90WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (2W higher).
Shallower Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 46.4mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 0.53mm shallower than the DELL P2415Q (46.4mmmm).
User reviews are better
Based on 134 reviews, the DELL U2715H has an average user review score of 94%, whereas the DELL P2415Q has an average rating of 87% (based on 48 reviews).

Reasons Against

14 Reasons Against
3.2" smaller screen size Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 3.2" smaller than the DELL U2715H (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

39.2mm smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a viewable height of 296.46mmmm, whereas the DELL U2715H is a 335.66mmmm viewable height PC monitor (39.2mm bigger).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 527.04mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 69.7mm smaller than the DELL U2715H (596.74mmmm).
15.77M less display colour count Edit
DELL P2415Q is only 1,070MM display colours, but the DELL U2715H is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M more).
8.11cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 60.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 8.11cm smaller than the DELL U2715H (68.58cmcm).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL U2715H (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
25% slower response time Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a response time of 8msms, however the DELL U2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two less USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL P2415Q is four, but the DELL U2715H only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2715H only has two HDMI ports.
Only four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a four USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2715H only has six USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.
Two less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL P2415Q is four, but the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports.
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 90WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 2W higher than the DELL U2715H (88WW).
A bit deeper Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 46.93mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2715H is a 46.4mmmm deep PC monitor (0.53mm shallower).
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the DELL P2415Q is 87%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL U2715H is 94% (based on 134 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Heavier Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6g heavier than the DELL P2415Q (4.9kgg).
Marginally taller Edit
DELL U2715H is 363.4mmmm tall, but the DELL P2415Q is a 336.06mmmm tall PC monitor (27.34mm shorter).
46.06mm wider Edit
DELL U2715H is 612.7mmmm wide, but the DELL P2415Q is a 566.64mmmm wide PC monitor (46.06mm narrower).
$226 more expensive
The DELL U2715H is more expensive than the DELL P2415Q by $225.74.
Fewer sellers
Only 2 shops sells the DELL U2715H, but 21 shops sell the DELL P2415Q. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
One month older
The DELL U2715H is older than the DELL P2415Q by one month.
Slightly Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the DELL U2715H is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL P2415Q is 84% (based on 1 review).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

25 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 55.17
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 57.50
Purchase price $ 329.44
Total cost of ownership $ 386.94
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.37T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.37 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
23.8" 27"
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
Backlight Type
 Edge-lit LED
BEST
 Edge-lit LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 2160p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
Viewable Height
296.46mm 335.66mm
BEST
Viewable Width
527.04mm 596.74mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.13725 x 0.13725 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
1,070M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.47cm 68.58cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
8ms 6ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 6ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
2 2
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
4 6
BEST
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
Mini DisplayPort
1 1
DVI Port
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
4 6
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 6
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 90 - 90
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 21
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 45 - 45

Power

Input Current
1.8A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
1.8A 1.5A
Typical Power Consumption
45W 36W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
90W 88W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 35 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.7kg 10.5kg
BEST
Weight With Stand
8.7kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
369.53mm
BEST
524.9mm
Depth With Stand
205mm 205mm
Width With Stand
566.64mm
BEST
612.7mm
Weight
3.3kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height
336.06mm
BEST
363.4mm
Depth
46.93mm 46.4mm
BEST
Width
566.64mm
BEST
612.7mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 USB
 AC
Feedback