Whirlpool WVE 22512 vs Whirlpool WVE 26562

Whirlpool WVE 22512
Whirlpool WVE 26562

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Longer cord length Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 is a 2.45m cord length freezer. That's 0.75m longer than the Whirlpool WVE 26562 (1.7m).
9% lower energy usage Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 is a 0.62kWh/24h energy usage freezer. That's 0.05kWh/24h lower than the Whirlpool WVE 26562 (0.67kWh/24h).
A bit lighter Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 has a weight of 63kg, however the Whirlpool WVE 26562 is a 69kg heavy freezer (6kg heavier).
23% cheaper to run
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 only costs $406.91 to run over five years but the Whirlpool WVE 26562 costs $528.08 to run (30% more). Read more
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Whirlpool WVE 22512 is "A++", however the rating of the Whirlpool WVE 26562 is "A++".
4 Reasons For
A lot longer storage time during power failure Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 26562 has a storage time during power failure of 35h, however the Whirlpool WVE 22512 is only a 24h storage time during power failure freezer (11h shorter). Read more

The length of time during which freezer can store food without mains power connection.

38L larger gross capacity Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 26562 has a gross capacity of 291L, whereas the Whirlpool WVE 22512 is only a 253L gross capacity freezer (38L smaller). Read more

The total capacity of the freezer, this is the sum of the capacity for food storage and the capacity of the freezer walls etc.

15% higher net capacity Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 26562 has a net capacity of 260L, however the Whirlpool WVE 22512 is only a 222L net capacity freezer (38L lower). Read more

The usable storage space of the freezer.

Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Whirlpool WVE 26562 is "A++", however the rating of the Whirlpool WVE 22512 is "A++".

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
A lot shorter storage time during power failure Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 has a storage time during power failure of 24h, however the Whirlpool WVE 26562 is a 35h storage time during power failure freezer (11h longer). Read more

The length of time during which freezer can store food without mains power connection.

38L smaller gross capacity Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 has a gross capacity of 253L, whereas the Whirlpool WVE 26562 is a 291L gross capacity freezer (38L larger). Read more

The total capacity of the freezer, this is the sum of the capacity for food storage and the capacity of the freezer walls etc.

18% lower net capacity Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 has a net capacity of 222L, however the Whirlpool WVE 26562 is a 260L net capacity freezer (38L higher). Read more

The usable storage space of the freezer.

Two months older
The Whirlpool WVE 22512 is older than the Whirlpool WVE 26562 by two months.
4 Reasons Against
Shorter cord length Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 26562 is a 1.7m cord length freezer. That's 0.75m shorter than the Whirlpool WVE 22512 (1.7m).
8% higher energy usage Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 26562 is a 0.67kWh/24h energy usage freezer. That's 0.05kWh/24h higher than the Whirlpool WVE 22512 (0.67kWh/24h).
Slightly heavier Edit
The Whirlpool WVE 26562 has a weight of 69kg, however the Whirlpool WVE 22512 is a 63kg heavy freezer (6kg lighter).
More expensive to run over five years by 30%
The running costs over five years of the Whirlpool WVE 26562 are $528.08 which is $121.17 more than the Whirlpool WVE 22512. Show assumptions.

Date Released

29 months Ago 28 months Ago

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 406.91
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 406.91
Electricity cost - switched on $ 528.08
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 528.08

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

2.6T
Running this freezer over 10 years will generate 2.6 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
67
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
3.4T
Running this freezer over 10 years will generate 3.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
87
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Design

Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Type
 Upright
 Upright
Shelve/basket
6 Unknown - Click to provide data
Reversible Door
 Reversible door
Unknown - Click to provide data
Door Hinge
 Left
 Left
Colour
 White
 Stainless steel
 White
 Stainless steel

Performance

Thermostat
 Thermostat
 Thermostat
Fast Freeze Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Fast freeze function
Noise Level
41dB 41dB
Defrost Function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Defrost function
No Frost System
 No frost system
 No frost system
Climate Class
 T
 T
Star Rating
 4*
 4*
Storage Time During Power Failure
24h 35h
BEST
Freezing Capacity
26kg/24h 26kg/24h
Gross Capacity
253L 291L
BEST
Net Capacity
222L 260L
BEST

Ergonomics

Cord Length
2.45m
BEST
1.7m
Adjustable Foot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable foot

Power

Current
10A 10A
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
AC Input Voltage
 220
 220 - 240
 220
 220 - 240
Annual Energy Consumption
225kWh
BEST
292kWh
Energy Usage
0.62kWh/24h
BEST
0.67kWh/24h
Connected Load
150W 150W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A++
 A++

Weight & Dimensions

Width
595mm 595mm
Height
1,670mm 1,875mm
Depth
645mm 630mm
Weight
63kg
BEST
69kg
Package Weight
65000 71000
Package Height
1,735mm 1,940mm
Package Depth
705mm 705mm
Package Width
640mm 640mm
Feedback