Canon XF200 vs Sony HXR-NX3 vs Sony PXW-X160 vs Sony PXW-X180

Canon XF200
Sony HXR-NX3
Sony PXW-X160
Sony PXW-X180

Top Prices

eBay
6th Avenue Express
Delivery unknown
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock
Overstock
CW Media Pro
Delivery unknown
In stock (100 available)
Unique Photo
Out of stock
6ave
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 8 left!
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock
Adorama
Out of stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
23% bigger sensor size Edit
The Canon XF200 has a sensor size of 3.09MPMP. That's 0.68MP bigger than the Sony HXR-NX3 (). Read more

A megapixel (MP or Mpx) is one million pixels, and is a term used not only for the number of pixels in an image, but also to express the number of image sensor elements of digital cameras or the number of display elements of digital displays. For example, a camera that makes a 2048 1536 pixel image typically uses a few extra rows and columns of sensor elements and is commonly said to have "3.2 megapixels" or "3.4 megapixels", depending on whether the number reported is the "effective" or the "total" pixel count (as opposed to the 2048 1536 = 3,145,728 finished image pixels).

A larger number of megapixels increases the sharpness of images and video.

0.4lx smaller minimum illumination Edit
The Canon XF200 is a 0.1lxlx minimum illumination camcorder. That's 0.4lx smaller than the Sony HXR-NX3 ().
Hugely lighter Edit
The Canon XF200 has a weight of 1.6kgg, but the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 2.2kgg weight camcorder (0.6g heavier) and the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 2.7kgg weight camcorders (1.1g heavier). Read more

Weight of the camcorder including battery.

A lighter camcorder is easier to handle when recording and to carry when travelling.

28% smaller Edit
The Canon XF200 has a height of 158mmmm. That's 35mm smaller than the Sony HXR-NX3 (201.5mmmm) and 43.5mm smaller than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (201.5mmmm).
Smaller Edit
Canon XF200 is 264mmmm deep. That's 129mm smaller than the Sony HXR-NX3 (412mmmm) and 148mm smaller than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (412mmmm).
Smaller Edit
Canon XF200 is 144mmmm wide. That's 30.5mm smaller than the Sony HXR-NX3 (191.5mmmm) and 47.5mm smaller than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (191.5mmmm).
7 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
5 Reasons For
Longer maximum focal length Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 is a 705mmmm maximum focal length camcorder. That's 129mm longer than the Canon XF200 (650mmmm) and 55mm longer than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (650mmmm).
13% lower minimum aperture Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 has a minimum aperture of 1.6 (as do the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180), however the Canon XF200 is a 1.8 minimum aperture camcorder (0.2 higher).
Vastly higher maximum aperture value Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 has a maximum aperture value of 11 (as do the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180), however the Canon XF200 is only a 2.8 maximum aperture value camcorder (8.2 lower).
Vastly higher display resolution Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 has a display resolution of 921,000 pixels pixels, however the Canon XF200 is only a 1,230,000 pixels pixels display resolution camcorder (920 pixels lower). Read more

Total number of pixels that display has.

$2,875 cheaper
The Sony HXR-NX3 is $2,874.83 cheaper than the Canon XF200, $3,396.89 cheaper than the Sony PXW-X160 and $3,777.02 cheaper than the Sony PXW-X180.
6 Reasons For
Bigger optical zoom Edit
Sony PXW-X160 is 25xx (optical) (as does the Sony PXW-X180), but the Canon XF200 and the Sony HXR-NX3 are both only 20xx (optical) camcorders (5x smaller). Read more

An optical zoom lets you enlarge the subject without having to move closer to it.

An optical zoom lets you zoom without loosing image quality. Digital zooms will simply enlarge the pixels and make the image look blurry.

0.2 lower minimum aperture Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 has a minimum aperture of 1.6 (as do the Sony HXR-NX3 and the Sony PXW-X180), whereas the Canon XF200 is a 1.8 minimum aperture camcorder (0.2 higher).
11% shorter minimum focal length Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 has a minimum focal length of 26mmmm (as does the Sony PXW-X180), however the Canon XF200 and the Sony HXR-NX3 are both 28.8mmmm minimum focal length camcorders (2.8mm longer).
8.2 higher maximum aperture value Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 has a maximum aperture value of 11 (as do the Sony HXR-NX3 and the Sony PXW-X180), whereas the Canon XF200 is only a 2.8 maximum aperture value camcorder (8.2 lower).
Larger viewfinder screen size Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 is a 0.5"" viewfinder screen size camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X180. That's 0.05" larger than the Canon XF200 and the Sony HXR-NX3 (0.5"").
50% higher viewfinder resolution Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 is a 2,360,000 pixels pixels viewfinder resolution camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X180. That's 1 pixels higher than the Canon XF200 (2,360,000 pixels pixels).
6 Reasons For
5x bigger optical zoom Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 is a 25xx (optical) camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X160. That's 5x bigger than the Canon XF200 and the Sony HXR-NX3 (25xx). Read more

An optical zoom lets you enlarge the subject without having to move closer to it.

An optical zoom lets you zoom without loosing image quality. Digital zooms will simply enlarge the pixels and make the image look blurry.

13% lower minimum aperture Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 is a 1.6 minimum aperture camcorder, and so do the Sony HXR-NX3 and the Sony PXW-X160. That's 0.2 lower than the Canon XF200 (1.6).
Shorter minimum focal length Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 is a 26mmmm minimum focal length camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X160. That's 2.8mm shorter than the Canon XF200 and the Sony HXR-NX3 (26mmmm).
75% higher maximum aperture value Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 is an 11 maximum aperture value camcorder, and so do the Sony HXR-NX3 and the Sony PXW-X160. That's 8.2 higher than the Canon XF200 (11).
0.05" larger viewfinder screen size Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 has a viewfinder screen size of 0.5"" (as does the Sony PXW-X160), whereas the Canon XF200 and the Sony HXR-NX3 are both only 0.45"" viewfinder screen size camcorders (0.05" smaller).
A lot higher viewfinder resolution Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 has a viewfinder resolution of 2,360,000 pixels pixels (as does the Sony PXW-X160), whereas the Canon XF200 is only a 1,230,000 pixels pixels viewfinder resolution camcorder (1 pixels lower).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Smaller optical zoom Edit
Canon XF200 is only 20xx (optical), and so does the Sony HXR-NX3. That's 5x smaller than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (25xx). Read more

An optical zoom lets you enlarge the subject without having to move closer to it.

An optical zoom lets you zoom without loosing image quality. Digital zooms will simply enlarge the pixels and make the image look blurry.

23% shorter maximum focal length Edit
The Canon XF200 has a maximum focal length of 576mmmm, however the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 705mmmm maximum focal length camcorder (129mm longer) and the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 650mmmm maximum focal length camcorders (74mm longer).
0.2 higher minimum aperture Edit
The Canon XF200 is a 1.8 minimum aperture camcorder. That's 0.2 higher than the Sony HXR-NX3, the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (1.6).
10% longer minimum focal length Edit
The Canon XF200 is a 28.8mmmm minimum focal length camcorder, and so does the Sony HXR-NX3. That's 2.8mm longer than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (26mmmm).
Significantly lower maximum aperture value Edit
The Canon XF200 is a 2.8 maximum aperture value camcorder. That's 8.2 lower than the Sony HXR-NX3, the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (11).
Nine hundred and twenty times lower display resolution Edit
The Canon XF200 is a 1,230,000 pixels pixels display resolution camcorder. That's 920 pixels lower than the Sony HXR-NX3 (). Read more

Total number of pixels that display has.

Smaller viewfinder screen size Edit
The Canon XF200 has a viewfinder screen size of 0.45"" (as does the Sony HXR-NX3), but the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 0.5"" viewfinder screen size camcorders (0.05" larger).
Lower viewfinder resolution Edit
The Canon XF200 has a viewfinder resolution of 1,230,000 pixels pixels, but the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 2,360,000 pixels pixels viewfinder resolution camcorders (1 pixels higher).
More expensive by $2,875
The Canon XF200 is $2,874.83 more expensive than the Sony HXR-NX3.
11 Reasons Against
0.68MP smaller sensor size Edit
Sony HXR-NX3 is only 2.41MPMP sensor, but the Canon XF200 is a 3.09MPMP sensor camcorder (0.68MP bigger). Read more

A megapixel (MP or Mpx) is one million pixels, and is a term used not only for the number of pixels in an image, but also to express the number of image sensor elements of digital cameras or the number of display elements of digital displays. For example, a camera that makes a 2048 1536 pixel image typically uses a few extra rows and columns of sensor elements and is commonly said to have "3.2 megapixels" or "3.4 megapixels", depending on whether the number reported is the "effective" or the "total" pixel count (as opposed to the 2048 1536 = 3,145,728 finished image pixels).

A larger number of megapixels increases the sharpness of images and video.

5x smaller optical zoom Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 is a 20xx (optical) camcorder (as does the Canon XF200), whereas the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 25xx (optical) camcorders (5x bigger). Read more

An optical zoom lets you enlarge the subject without having to move closer to it.

An optical zoom lets you zoom without loosing image quality. Digital zooms will simply enlarge the pixels and make the image look blurry.

Moderately longer minimum focal length Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 has a minimum focal length of 28.8mmmm (as does the Canon XF200), but the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 26mmmm minimum focal length camcorders (2.8mm shorter).
0.05" smaller viewfinder screen size Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 is a 0.45"" viewfinder screen size camcorder, and so does the Canon XF200. That's 0.05" smaller than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (0.5"").
0.4lx bigger minimum illumination Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 has a minimum illumination of 0.5lxlx, whereas the Canon XF200 is a 0.1lxlx minimum illumination camcorder (0.4lx smaller).
Heavier Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 is a 2.2kgg weight camcorder. That's 0.6g heavier than the Canon XF200 (2.7kgg) and 0.5g lighter than the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 (2.7kgg). Read more

Weight of the camcorder including battery.

A lighter camcorder is easier to handle when recording and to carry when travelling.

Bigger Edit
Sony HXR-NX3 is 193mmmm high, but the Canon XF200 is a 158mmmm high camcorder (35mm smaller) and the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 201.5mmmm high camcorders (8.5mm bigger).
129mm bigger Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 is a 393mmmm deep camcorder, whereas the Canon XF200 is a 264mmmm deep camcorder (129mm smaller) and the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 412mmmm deep camcorders (19mm bigger).
30.5mm bigger Edit
The Sony HXR-NX3 is a 174.5mmmm wide camcorder, whereas the Canon XF200 is a 144mmmm wide camcorder (30.5mm smaller) and the Sony PXW-X160 and the Sony PXW-X180 are both 191.5mmmm wide camcorders (17mm bigger).
Fewer sellers
Only 4 shops sells the Sony HXR-NX3, but 9 shops sell the Canon XF200. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this camcorder, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Over one year older
The Sony HXR-NX3 is older than the Canon XF200 by 13 months, older than the Sony PXW-X160 by five months and older than the Sony PXW-X180 by five months.
8 Reasons Against
Shorter maximum focal length Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 is a 650mmmm maximum focal length camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X180. That's 74mm longer than the Canon XF200 (650mmmm) and 55mm shorter than the Sony HXR-NX3 (650mmmm).
41% heavier Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 is a 2.7kgg weight camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X180. That's 1.1g heavier than the Canon XF200 (2.7kgg) and 0.5g heavier than the Sony HXR-NX3 (2.7kgg). Read more

Weight of the camcorder including battery.

A lighter camcorder is easier to handle when recording and to carry when travelling.

22% bigger Edit
The Sony PXW-X160 has a height of 201.5mmmm (as does the Sony PXW-X180), however the Canon XF200 is a 158mmmm high camcorder (43.5mm smaller) and the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 193mmmm high camcorder (8.5mm smaller).
A lot bigger Edit
Sony PXW-X160 is 412mmmm deep (as does the Sony PXW-X180), but the Canon XF200 is a 264mmmm deep camcorder (148mm smaller) and the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 393mmmm deep camcorder (19mm smaller).
Bigger Edit
Sony PXW-X160 is 191.5mmmm wide (as does the Sony PXW-X180), but the Canon XF200 is a 144mmmm wide camcorder (47.5mm smaller) and the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 174.5mmmm wide camcorder (17mm smaller).
$3,397 more expensive
The Sony PXW-X160 is more expensive than the Canon XF200 by $522.06 and more expensive than the Sony HXR-NX3 by $3,396.89.
Not as many stockists
Only 2 retailers sells the Sony PXW-X160, however 9 retailers sell the Canon XF200, 4 sellers sell the Sony HXR-NX3 and 3 sellers sell the Sony PXW-X180. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this camcorder remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Eight months older
The Sony PXW-X160 is older than the Canon XF200 by eight months. The Sony PXW-X160 is the same age as the Sony PXW-X180.
8 Reasons Against
55mm shorter maximum focal length Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 has a maximum focal length of 650mmmm (as does the Sony PXW-X160), but the Canon XF200 is a 576mmmm maximum focal length camcorder (74mm shorter) and the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 705mmmm maximum focal length camcorder (55mm longer).
A lot heavier Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 has a weight of 2.7kgg (as does the Sony PXW-X160), whereas the Canon XF200 is a 1.6kgg weight camcorder (1.1g lighter) and the Sony HXR-NX3 is a 2.2kgg weight camcorder (0.5g lighter). Read more

Weight of the camcorder including battery.

A lighter camcorder is easier to handle when recording and to carry when travelling.

Bigger Edit
Sony PXW-X180 is 201.5mmmm high, and so does the Sony PXW-X160. That's 43.5mm bigger than the Canon XF200 (201.5mmmm) and 8.5mm bigger than the Sony HXR-NX3 (201.5mmmm).
Bigger Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 is a 412mmmm deep camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X160. That's 148mm bigger than the Canon XF200 (412mmmm) and 19mm bigger than the Sony HXR-NX3 (412mmmm).
47.5mm bigger Edit
The Sony PXW-X180 is a 191.5mmmm wide camcorder, and so does the Sony PXW-X160. That's 47.5mm bigger than the Canon XF200 (191.5mmmm) and 17mm bigger than the Sony HXR-NX3 (191.5mmmm).
More expensive by $3,777
The Sony PXW-X180 is $902.19 more expensive than the Canon XF200, $3,777.02 more expensive than the Sony HXR-NX3 and $380.13 more expensive than the Sony PXW-X160.
Fewer sellers
The Sony PXW-X180 is only stocked by 3 stores, but the Canon XF200 is stocked by 9 sellers and the Sony HXR-NX3 is stocked by 4 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by eight months
The Sony PXW-X180 is eight months older than the Canon XF200. The Sony PXW-X180 is the same age as the Sony PXW-X160.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

22 months Ago 35 months Ago 30 months Ago 30 months Ago

Image Sensor

Sensor Size
3.09MP
BEST
2.41MP Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Optical Sensor Size
 1/2
BEST
 1/2
BEST
 1/2
 1/2
Sensor Type
 CMOS
 CMOS
 CMOS
 CMOS
Megapixel Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 2.07MP Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Movie Megapixel Count
2.91MP Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Lens System

Optical Zoom
20x 20x 25x
BEST
25x
BEST
Digital Zoom
6x Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Image Stabiliser
 Optical
BEST
 Optical
 Optical
 Optical
Maximum Focal Length
576mm 705mm
BEST
650mm 650mm
Minimum Aperture
1.8 1.6
BEST
1.6
BEST
1.6
BEST
Minimum Focal Length
28.8mm 28.8mm 26mm
BEST
26mm
BEST
Maximum Aperture Value
2.8 11
BEST
11
BEST
11
BEST
Filter Size
58mm 72mm 82mm 82mm
Focal Length
28.8 - 576 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Focal Length Range
3.67 - 73.4 4.1 - 82 3.7 - 92.5 3.7 - 92.5

Storage

Maximum Memory Card Size
64GB Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Memory Card Slot
3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Memory Card
 SD
 CF+
 SDXC
 SDHC
 MS Duo
 SD
 CF+
 SDXC
 SDHC
 MS Duo
BEST
 SD
 CF+
 SDXC
 SDHC
 MS Duo
 SD
 CF+
 SDXC
 SDHC
 MS Duo
Storage Media Type
 Memory card
 Memory card
 Memory card
 Memory card

Focusing

Closest Focusing Distance
0.01m Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Normal Focusing Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.01 - ∞/0.8 - ∞ Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Focus Adjustment
 Auto
 Manual
 Auto
 Manual
 Auto
 Manual
 Auto
 Manual

Light Exposure

Exposure Mode
 Manual
 Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Light Metering Type
 Centre-weighted
BEST
 Centre-weighted
 Centre-weighted
 Centre-weighted

White Balance

White Balance Mode
 Auto
 Tungsten
 Daylight
 Auto
 Tungsten
 Daylight
 Auto
 Tungsten
 Daylight
 Auto
 Tungsten
 Daylight

Shutter

Shutter Speed
0.0005 Unknown - Click to provide data 1/32 - 1/2000 1/32 - 1/2000

Display

Screen Size
3.5" 3.5" 3.5" 3.5"
Display Resolution
1,230,000 pixels 921,000 pixels
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display
 OLED
BEST
 OLED
 OLED
BEST
 OLED
BEST

Viewfinder

Viewfinder Screen Size
0.45" 0.45" 0.5"
BEST
0.5"
BEST
Viewfinder Resolution
1,230,000 pixels Unknown - Click to provide data 2,360,000 pixels
BEST
2,360,000 pixels
BEST
Viewfinder
 Electronic
 Electronic
 Electronic
 Electronic

Camera

Camcorder Type
 handheld
 Shouldercam
BEST
 handheld
 Shouldercam
 handheld
 Shouldercam
 handheld
 Shouldercam
Image Processor
 DIGIC DV IV
BEST
 DIGIC DV IV
 DIGIC DV IV
 DIGIC DV IV
Minimum Illumination
0.1lx
BEST
0.5lx Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Video

HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Video Capturing Speed
50fps 50fps Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
Video Format
 MP4
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MXF
 AVI
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVCHD
 AVC
 DV
 MP4
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MXF
 AVI
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVCHD
 AVC
 DV
 MP4
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MXF
 AVI
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVCHD
 AVC
 DV
 MP4
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MXF
 AVI
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVCHD
 AVC
 DV
Video Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1440 x 1080
 1280 x 720
 640 x 360
 720 x 576
 1920 x 1080
 1440 x 1080
 1280 x 720
 640 x 360
 720 x 576
 1920 x 1080
 1440 x 1080
 1280 x 720
 640 x 360
 720 x 576
 1920 x 1080
 1440 x 1080
 1280 x 720
 640 x 360
 720 x 576
Maximum Video Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Maximum Frame Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 50fps Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Still Image

Maximum Image Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
BEST

Audio

Audio Format
 MP4
 LPCM
 PCM
 MP4
 LPCM
 PCM
BEST
 MP4
 LPCM
 PCM
BEST
 MP4
 LPCM
 PCM
BEST

Ports & Interfaces

Mini HDMI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini-USB 2.0 Port
1 1 1 1

Battery

Video Recording Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.85h Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Battery Type
Unknown - Click to provide data NP-F970 BP-U30 BP-U30c
Battery Voltage
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.2V Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Battery
 Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
 Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
 Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
BEST
 Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
BEST
Battery Capacity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 28Wh 28Wh
Battery Recharge Time
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2.23h 2.23h
Battery Slot
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1

Operational Conditions

Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40
Operating Relative Humidity Range
0 - 85 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60

Weight & Dimensions

Weight
1.6kg
BEST
2.2kg 2.7kg 2.7kg
Height
158mm
BEST
193mm 201.5mm 201.5mm
Depth
264mm
BEST
393mm 412mm 412mm
Width
144mm
BEST
174.5mm 191.5mm 191.5mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 DC
 USB
 AC
BEST
 DC
 USB
 AC
 DC
 USB
 AC
BEST
 DC
 USB
 AC
BEST
Feedback